« June 2008 | Main | August 2008 »

July 23, 2008

Twitter while you work?

Debating the value of social media is like questioning the value of your favorite hammer. It can be of great use, if only you possess the skill to hit the nail on the head!

There is quite a bit of talk about Twitter, the instant communication social media whose popularity is growing exponentially. However popular, the nagging question lingers: Is Twitter valuable? How can the technology be used to enhance business? Within the skeptical realm of journalists, as technologies such as Twitter revamp their world, there are many who say Twitter is much ado about nothing.

John Dickerson, chief political correspondent for Slate, offers an informative and practical account of how Twitter can further journalists' connections with their readers.

I'm still learning about Twitter, and its potential value. It is intriguing, and while it may never be my favorite tool, it certainly could find its way into my tool box.

July 15, 2008

A Swing....and a Miss!

Ever wonder how the media could be so mean? So downright wrong on a topic that they must be out to get someone?

You may be right. Sometimes media circle like the proverbial sharks in the water, and sometimes they have good reason for doing so.

But consider, sometimes, that the media just plain get it wrong. In many respects, reporting the news, editing and producing coverage is as much art as anything else. And sometimes, art can simply be bad,

The New Yorker cover dated July 21 is making lots of news. It portrays the Obamas in the Oval office, with Barack dressed as a Muslim and Michelle as an armed militant. The U.S. flag is burning in the fireplace and a portrait of Osama is hanging on the wall.

The Washington Post article and AP video here discuss the pros and cons of such satire, as well as the New Yorker editor's defense of the cover.

Here is an interesting article in Editor & Publisher quoting several artists analysis of the cover.

The issue is worth analyzing. Did it do Obama harm? Did it foster debate? Was any derived social benefit worth the cost?

But the bottom line? The cover just doesn't work. Don't read ill intent into the cover. Call it a swing and a miss.

July 14, 2008

Forbes.com editor: CEO Network can be an opportunity

Klaus Kneale is CEO Network editor for Forbes.com. His task is to trigger debate on a selection of interesting, useful and distinctive issues aimed at C-suite level readers worldwide.

Some recent topics covered include the 4-day workweek, business news readership trends among CEOs and the proprieties of accepting a counteroffer from your current employer rather than accept a new high-level position.

An added benefit to the site is its potential networking aspects.

The CEO Network has been revamped. I recently asked Klaus about the network and its goals.

Q. What is Forbes.com trying to accomplish with the CEO Network?

A. At its core, the CEO Network is an online community for top tier business executives. Membership is by invitation only but once inside, a member is part of a community of like-minded and like-experienced professionals.

Q. How are you intending to choose the questions you ask of the corporate participants?

A. Although Forbes.com will facilitate some discussion, the members shouldn’t expect to be interviewed. The topics of conversation are really in the hands of the members. They should have conversations — even arguments — about what matters to them. If the members care about, say, the high price of aluminum, then the high price of aluminum will find its way into the discussion.

Q. What value will the participants gain through this?

A. CEO Network members will have a chance to read exclusive material from Forbes and Forbes.com. But the real value to the network is the network itself. I would like to think that the chairman of a large manufacturing company in India and the CEO of a small power company in Montana could meet through this platform and share ideas. Experience, wisdom, and even a certain level of empathy can cross distances these things wouldn’t normally cross.

Q. This discussion group of sorts could include some high profile corporate leaders. What topics do you envision tackling and will you moderate the ensuing debate?

A. Business. All the members are presumably in business because of business. Although any topic is fair game on the network, business is what I believe will drive most of the conversations and arguments. I couldn’t begin to tell you what specifically will come up. Forbes.com won’t moderate discussions as much as add to them as another participant in the conversation. Conversation wandering away from the initial topic is part of any fluid discussion.

Q. Anything else you wish to add?

A. A network like this is all about the intangible value. We are trying to create a space where business leaders can confidently interact with one another.